Acta Univ. Bohem. Merid. 2022, 25(2):99-111 | DOI: 10.32725/acta.2022.0121446

Sustainability and Bank Capital, A Study of Indian Private Banks

Kamal Kishore
Apeejay School of Management, Delhi, India

Banks’ lending business being risk based must be supported by adequate quantum of capital to ensure sustainability, soundness and resilience of the bank. The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision announced in 1988, a set of capital norms for banks to observe in order to reinforce their financial stability and soundness when struck by potential losses from deterioration of asset quality. This was known as Basel I. For the purpose of capital adequacy, capital has been sub divided into Common Equity Tier 1, Additional Tier1 and Tier 2 capital. Capital Adequacy, on this basis, has also been classified based on component of capital. The study reveals that all the new private sector banks are deeply conscious of the sustainability of their capital from the stand point of their operations and risk profile of assets. As a good strategy, they have been gradually building on their capital funds in consonance with their business growth. A sensitivity analysis of capital sustainability shows that even 10% escalation in risk weighted assets will not impair the capital adequacy significantly as the ratio will continue to be well above the benchmark ratio of 9 %. The role of Indian bank regulator is laudable in this regard as it has been studiously inspecting capital ratios of banks both by on site and off site appraisal of banks.

Keywords: Capital Adequacy, New private sector banks, Risk weighted assets, Sustainability, Tier 1 capital
JEL classification: G28

Accepted: November 29, 2022; Published: November 30, 2022  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Kishore, K. (2022). Sustainability and Bank Capital, A Study of Indian Private Banks. Acta Universitatis Bohemiae Meridionalis25(2), 99-111. doi: 10.32725/acta.2022.012
Download citation

References

  1. Alkadamani, K. (2015). Capital Adequacy, Bank Behavior and Crisis: Evidence from Emergent Economies. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 4(2): 329-338. Go to original source...
  2. Berger, A. N., Herring, R. J., & Szegö, G. P. (1995). The role of capital in financial institutions. Journal of Banking and Finance, 19: 393-430. Go to original source...
  3. BIS. (2019). Bank for International Settlement. History of Basel committee. https://www.bis.org/bcbs/history.htm
  4. Bouma, J., Jeucken, J., & Kilkers. L. (2001). Sustainable Banking: The Greening of Finance. Sheffield, UK: Greenleaf Publishing.
  5. Cohen, B., H. (2013). How have banks adjusted to higher capital requirements? BIS Quarterly Review. https://www.bis.org/publ/qtrpdf/r_qt1309e.pdf
  6. Das, A., & Ghosh, S. (2004). Risk, capital and operating efficiency: Evidence from Indian public sector banks. MPRA Paper No. 17399. Indian Journal of Economics and Business, 3(1): 147-164.
  7. Das, S., & Sy, Amadou, N. R. (2012). IMF Working Paper No. 12/36 "How Risky Are Banks' Risk Weighted Assets? Evidence from the Financial Crisis". Accessed from https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2012/wp1236.pdf. Go to original source...
  8. Dautovic, E. (2019). Has regulatory capital made banks safer? Skin in the game vs moral hazard. Working Paper Series No 91 / April 2019 (https://ssrn.com/abstract=3332501) Go to original source...
  9. Ghosh, S. (2014). Risk, capital and financial crisis: Evidence for GCC banks. Borsa Istanbul Review 14(3): 145-157. Go to original source...
  10. Heid, F., Porath, D., & Stolz, S. (2004). Does capital regulation matter for bank behaviour? Evidence for German Savings Banks. Discussion paper series 2, 03/2004, Deutsche Bundesbank. Go to original source...
  11. Hogan, T. L. (2015). Capital and risk in commercial banking: A comparison of capital and risk-based capital ratios. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 57: 32-45. Go to original source...
  12. Ingves, S. (2014). Banking on Leverage. Keynote address by Chairman, BCBS to the 10th Asia-Pacific High-Level Meeting on Banking Supervision, jointly organised by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS), the Financial Stability Institute (FSI), February, 2014.
  13. Majcher, P. (2015). Increased Bank Capital Requirements: Neither Panacea nor Poison: Procedia Economics and Finance, 25: 249 - 255. www.sciencedirect.com Go to original source...
  14. Mathuva, D. M. (2009). Capital adequacy, cost income ratio and the performance of commercial banks: The Kenyan scenario. Int. J. Applied Econ. Finance, 3(2): 35-47. Go to original source...
  15. Mayes, D. G., & Stremmel, H. (2014). The effectiveness of capital adequacy measures in predicting bank distress. SUERF - The European Money and Finance Forum. Retrieved on: November 30, 2016, from: http://www.suerf.org/docx/s_dfbd282c18300fa0eccceea6c5fac41f_3991_suerf.pdf.
  16. Olalekan, A., & Adeyinka, S. (2013). Capital Adequacy and Bank's Profitability : An Empirical Evidence from Nigeria. American International Journal of Contemporary Research, 3(10):87-93.
  17. RBI. (2015). RBI Master circular DBR.No.BP.BC.1/21.06.201/2015-16 dated 1st July,
  18. 2015 regarding Basel III. Available on www.rbi.org.in
  19. RBI. (2019). Master Circular No.DBOD.BP.BC.15/21.06.001/2010-11 dated July 1, 2019. Available on www.rbi.org.in
  20. RBI. (2021). RBI Statistical Tables relating to Banks. Available on https://dbie.rbi.org.in/DBIE/dbie.rbi?site=publications#!4
  21. UNEP. 2016. Green Finance for Developing Countries: Needs, Concerns and Innovations. United Nations Environment Programme. Retrieved from http://www.sustainablefinance.ch/upload/cms/user/201607_Green_Finance_for_Developing_Countries_UNEP.pdf

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.