Acta Univ. Bohem. Merid. 2025, 28(1):34-54 | DOI: 10.32725/acta.2025.003325

Study of the Factors Affecting Adaption of Sustainable Technology Transfer

Preeti Chawla1, Neetu Chhillar2
1 The NorthCap University, Near Rotary Public School Cartarpuri Alias, Huda, Sector 23A, Gurugram, Haryana 122017, India
2 Lal Bahadur Shastri Institute of Management, 11/07 Dwarka Sector 11, near Metro Station, New Delhi, Delhi 110075, India

Adopting sustainable technology transfer practices is crucial for promoting environmental preservation, efficient resource utilization, socioeconomic progress, and resilience to climate change, thus ensuring a more sustainable and equitable future. This study aimed to evaluate how specific factors influence the adaptation of technology transfer and their alignment with sustainability principles. Data were gathered from industry experts and practitioners using a mixed methods approach. Structural equation modelling (SEM) was employed with 135 respondents to conduct confirmatory factor analysis using AMOS. The results underscore the significance of prioritizing Monitoring and Evaluation, as well as Policy and Regulation efforts to support the adaptation of technology transfer for sustainable initiatives. Conversely, the negative correlation observed between Stakeholder Engagement and technology transfer adaptation suggests the need to carefully balance engagement activities. Although Environmental Considerations exhibit a positive association with technology transfer adaptation, the lack of statistical significance calls for further investigation. The high R-square value affirms the model's strength in explaining variations in technology transfer adaptation, advocating for a strategic resource allocation strategy that emphasizes effective monitoring and evaluation, supportive policy frameworks, and equitable stakeholder engagement. Collaboration is essential to tackle identified challenges and capitalize on opportunities to advance sustainable technology transfer, drive innovation, and foster resilient communities. This study enriches the existing literature on technology transfer sustainability, providing valuable insights for policymakers, practitioners, and scholars striving to address urgent environmental, social, and economic concerns.

Keywords: Technology transfer, sustainability practices, adaptation of technology transfer, policy and regulation, stakeholder engagement, environmental considerations, monitoring and evaluation, sustainable development.
JEL classification: F18, O33, Q55, Q56, Q58

Received: November 3, 2024; Revised: February 18, 2025; Accepted: June 25, 2025; Prepublished online: June 25, 2025; Published: June 27, 2025  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Chawla, P., & Chhillar, N. (2025). Study of the Factors Affecting Adaption of Sustainable Technology Transfer. Acta Universitatis Bohemiae Meridionalis, 28(1), 34-54. doi: 10.32725/acta.2025.003
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Aerts, G., Cauwelier, K., de Pape, S., Jacobs, S., & Vanhondeghem, S. (2022). An inside-out perspective on stakeholder management in university technology transfer offices. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 175, 121291. Go to original source...
    2. Badu-Apraku, B., Fakorede, M. A. B., Menkir, A., Marfo, K. A., & Akanvou, L. (2005). Enhancing the capacity of national scientists to generate and transfer maize technology in West and Central Africa: research implementation, monitoring and evaluation. Experimental agriculture, 41(2), 137-160. Go to original source...
    3. Besharati, N., & Rios, O. G. (2017). A monitoring and evaluation framework for South-South cooperation. South African Institute of International Affairs.
    4. Blohmke, J. (2014). Technology complexity, technology transfer mechanisms and sustainable development. Energy for Sustainable Development, 23, 237-246. Go to original source...
    5. Bozeman, B. (2000). Technology transfer and public policy: a review of research and theory. Research policy, 29(4-5), 627-655. Go to original source...
    6. Corsi, A., Pagani, R. N., & Kovaleski, J. L. (2020). Technology transfer for sustainable development: Social impacts depicted and some other answers to a few questions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 245, 118522. Go to original source...
    7. Craiut, L., Bungau, C., Bungau, T., Grava, C., Otrisal, P., & Radu, A. F. (2022). Technology Transfer, Sustainability, and Development, Worldwide and in Romania. Sustainability, 14(23), 15728. Go to original source...
    8. Davis, K. E. (2005). Regulation of technology transfer to developing countries: the relevance of institutional capacity. Law & Policy, 27(1), 6-32. Go to original source...
    9. Feng, X. Z., & Li, M. (2014). Literature Review on Suitability Monitoring of Emerging Technology Transfer for Sustainable Development. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 513, 867-870. Go to original source...
    10. Fernandes, C. I., Veiga, P. M., Ferreira, J. J., & Hughes, M. (2021). Green growth versus economic growth: do sustainable technology transfer and innovations lead to an imperfect choice? Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(4), 2021-2037. Go to original source...
    11. Ferreira, J. J., Fernandes, C. I., & Ferreira, F. A. (2020). Technology transfer, climate change mitigation, and environmental patent impact on sustainability and economic growth: A comparison of European countries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 150, 119770. Go to original source...
    12. Fitiu, A. (2017). Building sustainable development through technology transfer in a Romanian university. Sustainability, 9(11), 2042. Go to original source...
    13. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 18(1), 39-50. Go to original source...
    14. Gandenberger, C., Bodenheimer, M., Schleich, J., Orzanna, R., & Macht, L. (2016). Factors driving international technology transfer: Empirical insights from a CDM project survey. Climate Policy, 16(8), 1065-1084. Go to original source...
    15. Gaskin, J. and Lim, J. (2016). Model Fit Measures. AMOS Plugin. Gaskination's StatWiki.
    16. Gumbi, S. (2010). A review of performance standards to monitor, evaluate and assess the impact of technology transfer offices. South African Journal of Science, 106(7), 1-9. Go to original source...
    17. Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European business review, 31(1), 2-24. Go to original source...
    18. Hoekman, B. M., Maskus, K. E., & Saggi, K. (2005). Transfer of technology to developing countries: Unilateral and multilateral policy options. World development, 33(10), 1587-1602. Go to original source...
    19. Hyman, E. L., & Corl, T. C. (1984). A System for the Monitoring and Evaluation of Appropriate Technology Projects. Appropriate Technology International.
    20. Jeffries, C. P. (1977). Regulation of Transfer of Technology an Evaluation of the UNCTAD Code of Conduct. Harv. Int'l. LJ, 18, 309.
    21. Karakosta, C., Doukas, H., & Psarras, J. (2010). Technology transfer through climate change: Setting a sustainable energy pattern. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 14(6), 1546-1557. Go to original source...
    22. Kreiling, L., Serval, S., Peres, R., & Bounfour, A. (2020). University technology transfer organizations: Roles adopted in response to their regional innovation system stakeholders. Journal of Business Research, 119, 218-229. Go to original source...
    23. Lee, W. J., & Mwebaza, R. (2022). New strategy for innovative RD&D in view of stakeholder interaction during climate technology transfer. Sustainability, 14(14), 8363. Go to original source...
    24. Li, F., Zhang, S., & Jin, Y. (2018). Sustainability of university technology transfer: Mediating effect of inventor's technology service. Sustainability, 10(6), 2085. Go to original source...
    25. McAdam, M., Miller, K., & McAdam, R. (2021). A micro level investigation of stakeholder motives on university technology transfer business models. Studies in Higher Education, 46(5), 951-964. Go to original source...
    26. McCulloch, R. (1981). Technology transfer to developing countries: implications of international regulation. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 458(1), 110-122. Go to original source...
    27. Millstone, E., Van Zwanenberg, P., & Marshall, F. (2010). Monitoring and evaluating agricultural science and technology projects: theories, practices and problems. IDS Bulletin, 41(6), 75-87. Go to original source...
    28. Nunnally, J. C. (1994). Psychometric theory 3E. Tata McGraw-hill education, New York, NY.
    29. Pandey, N., de Coninck, H., & Sagar, A. D. (2022). Beyond technology transfer: Innovation cooperation to advance sustainable development in developing countries. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, 11(2), e422. Go to original source...
    30. Paniccia, P. M., & Baiocco, S. (2018). Co-evolution of the university technology transfer: Towards a sustainability-oriented industry: Evidence from Italy. Sustainability, 10(12), 4675. Go to original source...
    31. Salvador, R., Barros, M. V., do Prado, G. F., Pagani, R. N., Piekarski, C. M., & de Francisco, A. C. (2021). Knowledge and technology transfer in sustainability reports: fomenting stakeholder engagement for sustainable development. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(1), 251-264. Go to original source...
    32. Sam, K., Coulon, F., & Prpich, G. (2017). Use of stakeholder engagement to support policy transfer: A case of contaminated land management in Nigeria. Environmental Development, 24, 50-62. Go to original source...
    33. Schneider, M., Holzer, A., & Hoffmann, V. H. (2008). Understanding the CDM's contribution to technology transfer. Energy policy, 36(8), 2930-2938. Go to original source...
    34. Van der Gaast, W., Begg, K., & Flamos, A. (2009). Promoting sustainable energy technology transfers to developing countries through the CDM. Applied Energy, 86(2), 230-236. Go to original source...
    35. van Drooge, L., & Spaapen, J. (2022). Evaluation and monitoring of transdisciplinary collaborations. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 47(3), 747-761. Go to original source...
    36. Wu, A., & Li, T. (2020). Gaining sustainable development by green supply chain innovation: Perspectives of specific investments and stakeholder engagement. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(3), 962-975. Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content