Acta Univ. Bohem. Merid. 2022, 25(2):80-90 | DOI: 10.32725/acta.2022.0101607

Disruptive Technologies transforming lives with reference to COVID 19 Online Education: A Review Paper

Sanjay Manocha ORCID...1, Purvi Pujari ORCID...2, A. Katheeja Naseeha
1 Bharati Vidyapeeth, Institute of Management and Research, New Delhi, India
2 Bharati Vidyapeeth, Institute of Management Studies and Research, Navi Mumbai, India

The wave of innovation and logical progression continues unabated and on multiple fronts. Almost every breakthrough is lauded as a step forward, and the list of "next great things" continues to increase. Nonetheless, a few innovations have the potential to completely transform the situation, altering how people live and work, reshaping value pools, and creating entirely new products and services. The present Coronavirus pandemic is unexpectedly and drastically changing how individuals work, live, and communicate on an overall scale. The educational system is undergoing rapid transformations. The instructive framework is going through quick changes. These powerful moves can be deciphered according to the point of view of the problematic development hypothesis, which expresses that past associations were taken out from their areas because of their laziness in embracing innovation. Gigantic open internet-based courses (MOOCs), which were as of late presented, are considered as an incredible innovative power changing the instruction climate. The role of "disruptive" novel technology in higher education is examined in this research. These intriguing innovations, according to Disruptive Innovation theory given by Christensen's, are not expressly meant to improve advanced education learning and instruction, but they do have instructive potential. The motivation behind this review is to exhibit how advanced education foundations are going through key adjustments because of the need to digitize education and preparing exercises. The conversation and end unite central issues that can be utilized to the digitalization of education in the near future. Key

Keywords: Disruptive Innovation, Online education, COVID 19, MOOC

Accepted: November 29, 2022; Published: November 30, 2022  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Manocha, S., Pujari, P., & Katheeja Naseeha, A. (2022). Disruptive Technologies transforming lives with reference to COVID 19 Online Education: A Review Paper. Acta Universitatis Bohemiae Meridionalis25(2), 80-90. doi: 10.32725/acta.2022.010
Download citation

References

  1. Ahuja, K. C. (2020). Luxury Fashion Brands Embracing The Digital: An Exploratory Study to Unfold The Success Strategy. MANTHAN: Journal of Commerce and Management, 60-75. Go to original source...
  2. Al-Imarah, A. (2018). MOOCs, disruptive innovation and the future of higher education: A conceptual analysis . University of Bath. Go to original source...
  3. Anuj, K., & Nishu, A. (2021). An interconnection between COVID-19 and climate change problem. Journal of Statistics and Management Systems, 281-300. doi:doi: 10.1080/09720510.2021.1875568 Go to original source...
  4. Arslan, Y. G. (2022). An analysis to identify the structural breaks of Covid-19 in Turkey. Journal of Statistics and Management Systems, 1-18. doi:10.1080/09720510.2021.2000172 Go to original source...
  5. Belem Barbosa, J. r. (2018). Luxury Marketing Challenges and Opportunities in the Digital age. International Journal of Marketing, Communication and New Media.
  6. Berghaus, K. H. (2014). Luxury Goes Digital: How to Tackle the Digital Luxury brand Consumer Touchpoints. Journal of Global Fashion Marketing, 223-234. Go to original source...
  7. Bhalerao, K., Kumar, A., & Pujari, P. (2022). A Study of Barriers and Benefits of Artificial Intelligence Adoption in Small and Medium Enterprise. Academy of Marketing Studies Journal, 26, 1-6
  8. Bindu, R., Archana, B., & Anuj, K. (2021). A review of tourism sustainability in the era of Covid-19. Journal of Statistics and Management Systems, 1-18. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09720510.2021.1995196 Go to original source...
  9. Bozkurt, A., Akgun-Ozbek, E., & Zawacki-Richter, O. (2017). Trends and Patterns in Massive Open Online Courses: Review and Content Analysis of Research on MOOCs (2008-2015). The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(5), 118-147. Go to original source...
  10. Burnham, J. F. (2006). Scopus database: a review. Biomedical Digital Libraries, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-5581-3-1 Go to original source...
  11. Debbarma I, & Durai, T. Educational disruption: Impact of COVID-19 on students from the Northeast states of India. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2021; 120:105769. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105769 Go to original source...
  12. Christensen, C. M. (2008). Disruptive Innovation and Catalytic Change in Higher Education. Forum for the future of higher education, 43-48.
  13. Christensen, C. M. (2017, 5 24). Disruptive Innovation and Catalytic Change in Higher Education . Retrieved 10 16, 2021, from Forum for the Future of Higher Education: http://forum.mit.edu/articles/disruptive-innovation-and-catalytic-change-in-higher-education/
  14. Christensen, C. M., B. H., & Sadtler, T. M. (2006). Disruptive innovation for social change. Harvard business review, 84(12), 94.
  15. Christensen, C. M., Raynor, M., & McDonald, R. (2015). ' What is disruptive innovation? Harvard Business Review, 93, 44-53.
  16. Fassnacht, P. N. (2015). Selling Luxury Goods Online: Effects of online Accessibility and Price Display. International Journal of Retail and Distribution Managemenet.
  17. Fazeli, Z., Shukla, P., & Perks, K. (2019). Digital Buying Behavior: The Role of Regulatory Fit and Self-Construal in online Luxury Goods Purchase intentions. Psychology of Marketing, 1-12. Go to original source...
  18. Fink, L. D. (2007). The Power of Course Design to Increase Student Engagement and Learning. Winter 2007, 9(1).
  19. Foster, E. (2020). CITL Workshop: Designing Research Paper Assignments: Characteristics of Effective Assignments. Retrieved April 13, 2021, from Legigh University Libraries: Library Guides: https://libraryguides.lehigh.edu/citlworkshop_assignments
  20. Garcha, P. S., Mkwizu, K. H., & Sharma, R. C. (2020). Meeting the Challenges of Disruption due to COVID-19 Pandemic through MOOCs for Open and Distance Learning: Participants‟ Perception of mooKIT. 9. A Quarterly Refereed Journal of Dialogues on Education, 9(4), 49-68.
  21. Garcia-Morales, V. J., Garrido-Moreno, A., & Martin-Rojas, R. (2021). The Transformation of Higher Education After the COVID Disruption: Emerging Challenges in an Online Learning Scenario https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.61. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 1-6. Go to original source...
  22. Haddaway, N. R., Page, M. J., Pritchard, C. C., & McGuinness, L. A. (2022). PRISMA2020: An R package and Shiny app for producing PRISMA 2020-compliant flow diagrams, with interactivity for optimised digital transparency and Open Synthesis. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 18(2). https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1230 Go to original source...
  23. Hilmi, M. F. (2016). Disruptive Innovation in Education: Open Learning, Online Learning, MOOCs and What Next? . International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention, 5(10), 49-53.
  24. Huang, R., Tlili, A., Chang, T. W., Zhang, X., Nascimbeni, F., & Burgos, D. (2020). Disrupted classes, undisrupted learning during COVID-19 outbreak in China: application of open educational practices and resources. Smart Learning Environments, 7(1). Go to original source...
  25. Jacoby, J. (2014). The disruptive potential of the Massive Open Online Course: A literature review. Journal of Open, Flexible and Distance Learning, 18(1), 73-85. Go to original source...
  26. Jain, V. (2017). Luxury: Not for Consumption But developing Extended Digital Self. Journal of Human Values, 1-14. Go to original source...
  27. Jonas Holmqvist, J. W. (2020). Luxury in the digital Age: A multi-actor service encounter perspective. Journal of Business Research. Go to original source...
  28. Kim, J.-H. (2019). Luxury Brands In the Digital Age: Perceived Quality and Gender Difference. The International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research. Go to original source...
  29. Kumar, A. P. (2021). Artificial Intelligence: Technology 4.0 as a solution for healthcare workers during COVID-19 pandemic. 24(1),. Acta Universitatis Bohemiae Meridionalis,, 19-35. doi:DOI: 10.32725/acta.2021.002 Go to original source...
  30. Kumar, K. M. (2022). Mathematical model of a dynamic transmission of novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic in the World. Journal of Statistics and Management Systems, 1-22. doi:10.1080/09720510.2021.1995195 Go to original source...
  31. Langen, F. d., & Bosch, H. v. (2013). Massive Open Online Courses: disruptive innovations or disturbing inventions? Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 28(3), 216-226. Go to original source...
  32. Marina Leban, Y. S. (2019). Transformational Effects of social Media Lurking Practices on luxury Consumption. Journal of Business Research. Go to original source...
  33. Navdeep Athwal, V. K. (2019). Sustainable Luxury Marketing:A Synthesis and Research Agenda. international journal of management reviews, 1-22.
  34. O'Malley, J., & McGraw, H. (1999). Students Perceptions of Distance Learning, Online Learning and the Traditional Classroom. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, II(IV).
  35. Ossiannilsson, E., Altinay, F., & Altinay, Z. (2016). MOOCs as Change Agents to Boost Innovation in Higher Education Learning Arenas. Education Sciences, 6(4), 25. Go to original source...
  36. Peltier, J. W., Drago, W., & Schibrowsky, J. A. (2003). Virtual Communities and the Assessment of Online Marketing Education. Journal of Marketing Education, 25(3), 260-276. Go to original source...
  37. Perelman, L. J. (2014). MOOCs: Symptom, Not Cause of Disruption. 2014(August), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1145/2591680. Ubiquity, 2014(August), 1-15. Go to original source...
  38. Phillips, J. A., Schumacher, C., & Arif, S. (2016). Time Spent, Workload, and Student and Faculty Perceptions in a Blended Learning Environment. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 80(6), 102. Go to original source...
  39. Pujari, P. P. (2021). Impact of covid-19 on the mental health of healthcare workers: Predisposing factors, prevalence and supportive strategies. Asia Pacific Journal of Health Management, 16(4), 260-265. doi:https://doi.org/10.24083/apjhm.v16i4.1303 Go to original source...
  40. Rejula, R. V. (2021). COVID-19 peak estimation and effect of nationwide lockdown in India. Journal of Statistrics and Management Systems, 1-18. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09720510.2021.1964741 Go to original source...
  41. Rodrigues , M., Franco, M., & Silva, R. (2020). COVID-19 and Disruption in Management and Education Academics: Bibliometric Mapping and Analysis. . Sustainability, 12(18), 7362. Go to original source...
  42. Theall, M., Wager, W., & Svinicki, M. (2021). Gaining A Basic Understanding of the Subject. Retrieved from IDEA: https://www.ideaedu.org/idea-notes-on-learning/gaining-a-basic-understanding-of-the-subject/
  43. Truckle, S. (2019). How to Achieve E-Learning Accessibility. Retrieved April 14, 2021, from Skillcast: https://www.skillcast.com/blog/how-to-achieve-elearning-accessibility
  44. UNESCO. (2020, 3 4). COVID-19 Educational Disruption and Response. Retrieved 10 16, 2021, from UNESCO: https://en.unesco.org/covid19/educationresponse
  45. Utterback, J. M. (2005). Disruptive Technologies: An Expanded View. International Journal of Innovation Management, 9(1), 1-17. Go to original source...
  46. Urrutia, G., & Bonfill, X. (2010). Declaración PRISMA: una propuesta para mejorar la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas y metaanálisis. Medicina Clínica, 135(11), 507-511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medcli.2010.01.015 Go to original source...
  47. Wang, K.-M. (2022). The contagion effect of COVID-19 on stock markets. Journal Of Statistics and Management Systems, 1-20. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09720510.2021.1972621 Go to original source...
  48. Yuan, L., & Powell, S. (2013). MOOCs and disruptive innovation: Implications for higher education. CETIS (Centre for Educational Technology & Interoperability Standards), University of Bolton.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.