Acta Univ. Bohem. Merid. 2013, 16(2):169-183 | DOI: 10.32725/acta.2013.016985

Analýza nerovnoměrnosti rozdělení hrubé přidané hodnoty podniků polní výroby

Zdeňka Malá, Gabriela Trnková
Czech University of Life Sciences Prague

Cílem příspěvku je zhodnocení nerovnosti hrubé přidané hodnoty podniků polní výroby, včetně vymezení determinantů, které zmíněnou nerovnost vyvolávají, či naopak eliminují. Naplnění uvedeného cíle je založeno na kvantifikaci a dekompozici Giniho koeficientu a na kvantifikaci modelu náhodných efektů. Panelová data pochází z databáze Creditinfo a z databáze Státního zemědělského intervenčního fondu a reprezentují hospodaření cca 140 podniků polní výroby v letech 2005-2010. Výsledky příspěvku dokládají nerovnost hrubé přidané hodnoty, která je dána zejména rozdílnou velikostí podniku a rozdílnými přírodními podmínkami, v nichž podnik hospodaří. Nerovnost je eliminována zejména důchodovými dotacemi, nižší měrou jí odstraňují rovněž agroenvironmentální dotace.

Keywords: Rostlinná výroba, Hrubá přidaná hodnota, Dotace, Účetní přidaná hodnota, Nerovnost, Giniho koeficient, Dekompozice, Ekonometrický model

Analysis of Unequal Distribution of Gross Value Added in Plant Production Business

The aim of this paper is the evaluation of gross value added inequality in the field production businesses, including the definition of determinants that cause or eliminate the mentioned inequality. The fulfillment of this aim is based on the quantification and decomposition of the Gini coefficient and on quantification of random effects model. Panel data for the analysis were gained from the Creditinfo database and the State Agricultural Intervention Fund and represent the economic results of 140 field production companies from 2005-2010. Results of the paper document the inequality of gross value added, which is generated mainly by the differences in farm size and by different natural conditions, in which the firm farms. The inequality is eliminated mainly by income subsidies. Agri-environmental subsidies also eliminate the inequality but in less extent.

Keywords: Plant production, Gross farm income, Subsidies, Value added, Inequality, Gini coefficient, Decomposition, Econometric model
JEL classification: D30, Q12, Q18

Published: January 31, 2014  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Malá, Z., & Trnková, G. (2013). Analysis of Unequal Distribution of Gross Value Added in Plant Production Business. Acta Universitatis Bohemiae Meridionalis, 16(2), 169-183. doi: 10.32725/acta.2013.016
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Adams, R.H. (1999). Nonfarm Income, Inequality, and Land in Rural Egypt. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 2178. Dostupné z: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=636206
    2. Allanson, P. (2006). The redistributive effects of agricultural policy on Scottish farm incomes. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 57(1), 117-128. Go to original source...
    3. Allanson, P., & Rocchi, B. (2008). A comparative analysis of the redistributive effects of agricultural policy in Tuscany and Scotland. Review of agricultural and environmental studies, 86(1), 35-56. Go to original source...
    4. Baltagi, B.H., Jung, B.Ch., & Song, S.H. (2008). Testing for Heteroskedasticity and Serial Correlation in a Random Effects Panel Data Model. Working Paper No. 111. New York: Center for Policy Research.
    5. Benni, N., Finger, R., Mann, S., & Lerman, B. (2012). The distributional effects of agricultural policy reforms in Switzerland. Agricultural Economics, 58(11), 497-509. Go to original source...
    6. Berrebi, Z. M., & Silber, J. (1985). The Gini Coefficient and Negative Income: A Comment. Oxford Economic Papers, 347(3), 525-526. Go to original source...
    7. Green, W.H. (2008). Econometric Analysis. New Persey: Pearson Prentice Hall.
    8. Hsiao, Ch. (2003). Analysis of Panel Data. New York: Cambridge University Press. Go to original source...
    9. Chen, Ch.-N., Tsaur, T.-W., & Rhai, T-S. (1982). The Gini Coefficient and Negative Income. Oxford Economic Papers, 34(3), 473-478. Go to original source...
    10. Chrastinová, Z. (2009). Economic development in Slovak agriculture. Agricultural Economics, 55(2), 67-76. Go to original source...
    11. Kaditi, E. A., & Nitsi, E. I. (2011). Vertical and horizontal decomposition of farm income inequality in Greece. Agricultural economic review, 12(1), 69-80.
    12. Keeney, M. (2000). The distributional impact of direct payments on Irish farm incomes. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 51(2), 252-265. Go to original source...
    13. Lerman, R. I., & Yitzhaki, S. (1985). Income Inequality Effects by Income Source: A New Approach and Applications to the United States. Review of Economics an Statistics, 67(1), 151-156. Go to original source...
    14. Mishra, A., El-Osta, H., & Gillespie, J.M. (2009). Effect of agricultural policy on regional income inequality among farm households. Journal of Policy Modeling, 31, 325-340. Go to original source...
    15. Möllers, J. (2006). Außerlandwirtschaftliche Diversifikation im Transformationsprozzess: Diversifikationsentscheidungen und -strategien ländlicher Haushalte in Slowenien und Mazedonien. Halle: Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Central and Eastern Europe (IAMO).
    16. Moreddu, C. (2011). Distribution of Support and Income in Agriculture. OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Working Papers, 46, OECD Publishing. Dostupné z: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5kgch21wkm bx-en
    17. Stark, O., Taylor, J.E, & Yitzhaki, S. (1986). Remittances and inequality. Economic Journal, 96, 722-740. Go to original source...
    18. Stuart, A. (1954). The Correlation Between Variate-Values and Ranks in Sample from a Continuous Distribution. British Journal of Statistical Psychology 7, 37-44. Go to original source...
    19. Schmid, E., Hofreither, M. F., & Sinabell, F. (2006). Impacts of CAP Instruments on the Distribution of Farm Incomes - Results for Austria. Dostupné z: http://franz.sinabell.wifo.ac.at/papers/DP-13-2006.pdf
    20. Štolbová, M., & Hlavsa, T. (2008). The impact of the LFA payments on the FADN farms in the Czech Republic. Agricultural Economics, 54(10), 489-497. Go to original source...
    21. Podruzsik, S., Hubbard, C., Keszthelyi, S., & Hubbard, L. (2008). Farm income variability in Hungary: A comparison with the EU based on FADN records. Dostupné z: http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/48114/2/Farm%20income%20variability%20in%20Hungary_%20A%20comparison%20with%20the%20EU%20based%20on%20FADN%20records.pdf
    22. Trnková, G., & Malá, Z. (2012). Analysis of distribution impact of subsidies within the Common Agricultural Policy on field production businesses in the Czech Republic. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, LX(7), 415-424. Go to original source...
    23. Von Witzke, H. (1984). A Model of Income Distribution in Agriculture: Theory and Evidence. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 11(1), 65-83. Go to original source...
    24. Von Witzke, H. & Noleppa, S. (2006). Distributive Effects of Direct Payments in German Agriculture under the New Common Agricultural Policy of the European Union. Dostupné z: http://www.agrar.hu-berlin.de/fakultaet/departments/daoe/ihe/Veroeff/GMF_final_Engl_Distr.pdf
    25. Wooldridge, J.M. (2003). Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content